First there were multiple states that rejected the 14th amendment, but when their new governments were created due to reconstruction, these new governments accepted the amendment. [3] These words are inscribed on the U.S. Supreme court building. Disparate impact merely has an evidentiary value; absent a "stark" pattern, "impact is not determinative.". A unanimous Court, through Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, said that Oklahoma had deprived McLaurin of the equal protection of the laws: There is a vast difference—a Constitutional difference—between restrictions imposed by the state which prohibit the intellectual commingling of students, and the refusal of individuals to commingle where the state presents no such bar. In Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's opinion concurring in the judgment, however, she argued that by prohibiting only homosexual sodomy, and not heterosexual sodomy as well, Texas's statute did not meet rational-basis review under the Equal Protection Clause; her opinion prominently cited City of Cleburne, and also relied in part on Romer. upon by 218 Congressmen, were discussed in hundreds of speeches and countless editorials in the election of … [18], Though the equal protection clause is one of the most cited ideas in legal theory, it received little attention during the ratification of the 14th amendment. The Court may have added other tiers too, such as "enhanced rational basis" scrutiny,[65] and "exceedingly persuasive basis" scrutiny. As a whole, the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift in American constitutionalism, by applying substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Partly because of that enigmatic phrase, but mostly because of self-declared "massive resistance" in the South to the desegregation decision, integration did not begin in any significant way until the mid-1960s and then only to a small degree. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. [55], American public school systems, especially in large metropolitan areas, to a large extent are still de facto segregated. [16] This clause sought to protect the privileges and immunities of all citizens which now included Black men. Pdf. The Texas Court said Mexicans are members under the white race and do not fall under the "special class" under the 14th Amendment. Harlan also relied on the fact that Section Two of the Fourteenth Amendment "expressly recognizes the States' power to deny 'or in any way' abridge the right of their inhabitants to vote for 'the members of the [state] Legislature. It prohibits the hanging of a black man for a crime for which the white man is not to be hanged. Exclusion of blacks from juries, the Court concluded, was a denial of equal protection to black defendants, since the jury had been "drawn from a panel from which the State has expressly excluded every man of [the defendant's] race." 304 U.S. 144, 152 n.4 (1938). Warren, however, through persuasion and good-natured cajoling—he had been an extremely successful Republican politician before joining the Court—was able to convince all eight associate justices to join his opinion declaring school segregation unconstitutional. At the same time, the Court explicitly allowed sexism and other types of discrimination, saying that states "may confine the selection to males, to freeholders, to citizens, to persons within certain ages, or to persons having educational qualifications. The Act provided that all persons born in the United States were citizens (contrary to the Supreme Court's 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford), and required that "citizens of every race and color ... [have] full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens."[9]. The Supreme Court, applying the separate-but-equal principle of Plessy, held that a State offering a legal education to whites but not to blacks violated the Equal Protection Clause. Violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Several important affirmative action cases to reach the Supreme Court have concerned government contractors—for instance, Adarand Constructors v. Peña (1995) and City of Richmond v. J.A. In fact, much of the integration in the 1960s happened in response not to Brown but to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 39th United States Congress proposed the Fourteenth Amendment on June 13, 1866. Qualifications of its own Members", had excluded Southerners from Congress, declaring that their states, having rebelled against the Union, could therefore not elect members to Congress. The Equal Protection Clause itself applies only to the federal government. Thus, the equal protection clause is crucial to the protection of civil rights. [48] When Earl Warren became Chief Justice in 1953, Brown had already come before the Court. Strict scrutiny means that a challenged statute must be "narrowly tailored" to serve a "compelling" government interest, and must not have a "less restrictive" alternative. The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [79], The Supreme Court has been disinclined to extend full "suspect classification" status (thus making a law that categorizes on that basis subject to greater judicial scrutiny) for groups other than racial minorities and religious groups. [2], From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, "Constitutional Rights: Equal Protection", The Meaning of Equal Protection: Then, Now, and Tomorrow; American Bar Association, The 14th Amendment and Equal Protection Clause; YouTube, https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Equal_Protection_Clause&oldid=6491348, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. This page was last changed on 3 April 2019, at 16:12. This clause was the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation, and also the basis for many other decisions rejecting discrimination against, and bigotry towards people belonging to various groups. It was also in the Gilded Age that a ruling by the Supreme Court included headnotes written by John C. Bancroft, a former railway company president. "Education Finance Reform Litigation and Separation of Powers: Kentucky Makes Its Contribution,". Baker’s argument revolved around the Supremacy Clause. It was not this holding that proved especially controversial among commentators, and indeed, the proposition gained seven out of nine votes; Justices Souter and Breyer joined the majority of five—but only for the finding that there was an Equal Protection violation. [37], In the United States, the year 1877 marked the end of Reconstruction and the start of the Gilded Age. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Learn more. Under this theory, equal protection jurisprudence has been applied to voting rights. Such codes also established harsher criminal consequences for blacks than for whites. . [6] Currently, a plurality of historians believe that this judicial decision set the United States on the path to the Civil War, which led to the ratifications of the Reconstruction Amendments. [14] After the 13th amendment the South began to institute black codes which were restrictive laws seeking to keep Black Americans in a position of inferiority. At first blush, these few words do not appear to present difficulties in interpretation. In McLaurin, the University of Oklahoma had admitted McLaurin, an African-American, but had restricted his activities there: he had to sit apart from the rest of the students in the classrooms and library, and could eat in the cafeteria only at a designated table. [41] The Court, speaking through Justice Henry B. [16] While it is widely agreed that this was a key reason for the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, many historians adopt a much wider view. Equal Protection Clause – This part of the fourteenth amendment states that there may be no discrimination against them by the law. New York University Press. that the statute in question had its origin in the purpose, not so much to exclude white persons from railroad cars occupied by blacks, as to exclude colored people from coaches occupied by or assigned to white persons  ... [I]n view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not take from the State the power to classify in the adoption of police laws, but admits of the exercise of a wide scope of discretion in that regard, and avoids what is done only when it is without any reasonable basis and therefore is purely arbitrary. The meaning of the Equal Protection Clause has been the subject of much debate, and inspired the well-known phrase "Equal Justice Under Law". In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Court struck down a Texas statute prohibiting homosexual sodomy on substantive due process grounds. The Equal Protection Clause, made to protect all people equally and to ensure equal treatment under the law, is misused to allow for the mistreatment of different minority populations. The present situation, Vinson said, was the former. [10][11] Additionally, Congress wanted to protect white Unionists who were under personal and legal attack in the former Confederacy. [Emphasis in the original.]. Many scholars assert that the opinion of Justice Harlan Stone in United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938)[61] contained a footnote that was a critical turning point for equal protection jurisprudence,[62] but that assertion is disputed. Justice Lewis Powell, writing for the Court, stated, "Proof of racially discriminatory intent or purpose is required to show a violation of the Equal Protection Clause." [13], With the return to originalist interpretations of the Constitution, many wonder what was intended by the framers of the reconstruction amendments at the time of their ratification. [89] On the other side, it is argued that the purpose of the Equal Protection Clause is to prevent the socio-political subordination of some groups by others, not to prevent classification; since this is so, non-invidious classifications, such as those used by affirmative action programs, should not be subjected to heightened scrutiny. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. The Petitioner, Ms. Reed the mother of a deceased child (Petitioner), alleges a statute that prefers males over females in the administration of an estate to which they both have equal claims, violates the Equal Protection Clause … In response to Green, many Southern districts replaced freedom-of-choice with geographically based schooling plans; because residential segregation was widespread, little integration was accomplished. The same right to make a contract as is enjoyed by white citizens, means the right to make any contract which a white citizen may make. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. [21] With the abridgment of the Privileges and Immunities clause, legal arguments aimed at protecting Black American's rights became more complex and that is when the equal protection clause started to gain attention for the arguments it could enhance. [19] Instead the key tenet of the Fourteenth Amendment at the time of its ratification was the Privileges and Immunities Clause. Yet, in such challenges, the … New York) gave local districts discretion to set up schools that were deemed separate but equal. The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people, including all non-citizens, within its jurisdiction. A few years later, Justice Stanley Matthews wrote the Court's opinion in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886). Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 42d Congress, 1st Sess. Cram.com makes it easy to get the grade you want! There, the Supreme Court held that the different standards of counting ballots across Florida violated the equal protection clause. [4] However, the Supreme Court held in Bolling v. Sharpe (1954) that equal protection requirements apply to state and local governments through the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In Burns, the Alabama Supreme Court said:[31]. Equal Protection Clause From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Whether due to Brown, or due to Congressional action, or due to societal change, the percentage of black students attending majority-black school districts decreased somewhat until the early 1980s, at which point that percentage began to increase. p. 168. The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Van Alstyne, William. A decision to discriminate is often the result of political compromise, limited objectives, limited resources, prejudice, or a blend of these reasons. The Shelley case concerned a privately made contract that prohibited "people of the Negro or Mongolian race" from living on a particular piece of land. [17] Even in this halting decision the Court still acknowledged the context in which the Amendment was passed, stating that knowing the evils and injustice the 14th amendment was meant to combat is key in our legal understanding of its implications and purpose. “The Equal Protection Clause requires every county in the Commonwealth to enforce and apply the same standards and procedures for an election” the suit reads. "[60] According to that rationale, the segregation of schools in Washington D.C. was unauthorized and therefore illegal. The Court did employ similar principles, however, in combination with federalism principles. [75], Originally, the Fourteenth Amendment did not forbid sex discrimination to the same extent as other forms of discrimination. The law intended to destroy the distinctions of race and color in respect to the rights secured by it. [32] However, some states (e.g. 2d 225 (1971) Brief Fact Summary. [68], Choosing the standard of scrutiny can determine the outcome of a case, and the strict scrutiny standard is often described as "strict in theory and fatal in fact". equal protection definition: 1. a principle included in the 14th amendment of the US Constitution that says all people must be…. In that case, the plaintiff, a housing developer, sued a city in the suburbs of Chicago that had refused to re-zone a plot of land on which the plaintiff intended to build low-income, racially integrated housing. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that "no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause has been the basis for many decisions rejecting irrational or unnecessary discrimination against people belonging to various groups. A difference between the initial and final versions of the clause was that the final version spoke not just of "equal protection" but of "the equal protection of the laws". Whites almost never opted to attend black-identified schools, however, and blacks rarely attended white-identified schools. The equal protection clause extended this protection to the state governments. Equal protection, in United States law, the constitutional guarantee that no person or group will be denied the protection under the law that is enjoyed by similar persons or groups. "[58] In Lawrence v. Texas (2003) the Supreme Court added: "Equality of treatment and the due process right to demand respect for conduct protected by the substantive guarantee of liberty are linked in important respects, and a decision on the latter point advances both interests"[59] [28], Four of the original thirteen states never passed any laws barring interracial marriage, and the other states were divided on the issue in the Reconstruction era. In that case a black man was convicted of murdering a white police officer and sentenced to death in the state of Georgia. The Equal Protection Clause also applies to illegal immigrants in certain cases. The federal government enforces this protection on the states, ensuring that they do not. [5] In the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, the Supreme Court rejected abolitionism and determined Black men, whether free or in bondage, had no legal rights under the U.S. Constitution at the time. [76] On the other hand, as feminists like Victoria Woodhull pointed out, the word "person" in the Equal Protection Clause was apparently chosen deliberately, instead of a masculine term that could have easily been used instead. Brown, ruled that the Equal Protection Clause had been intended to defend equality in civil rights, not equality in social arrangements. In 1971, the Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education approved busing as a remedy to segregation; three years later, though, in the case of Milliken v. Bradley (1974), it set aside a lower court order that had required the busing of students between districts, instead of merely within a district. This Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation, and also the basis for many other decisions rejecting discrimination against people belonging to various groups. When Senator Jacob Howard introduced that final version, he said:[24]. As for public schooling, no states during this era of Reconstruction actually required separate schools for blacks. The Court rejected as "implausible" the dissent's argument that the amendment would not deprive homosexuals of general protections provided to everyone else but rather would merely prevent "special treatment of homosexuals. [52], The curtailment of busing in Milliken v. Bradley is one of several reasons that have been cited to explain why equalized educational opportunity in the United States has fallen short of completion. 1. [50][51] The Court set the case for re-argument on the question of how to implement the decision. The Supreme Court intervened a handful of times in the late 1950s and early 1960s, but its next major desegregation decision was not until Green v. School Board of New Kent County (1968), in which Justice William J. Brennan, writing for a unanimous Court, rejected a "freedom-of-choice" school plan as inadequate. [88] Likewise, the Equal Protection Clause does not apply to private universities and other private businesses, which are free to practice affirmative action unless prohibited by federal statute or state law. In dicta, however, Justice O'Connor, writing for the Court, said she expected that in 25 years, racial preferences would no longer be necessary. Harlan went on to argue that because (1) "public conveyances on land and water" use the public highways, and (2) innkeepers engage in what is "a quasi-public employment", and (3) "places of public amusement" are licensed under the laws of the states, excluding blacks from using these services was an act sanctioned by the state. The “Stop and Frisk” policy in New York allows officers to stop anyone who they feel looks suspicious. Subsequently, many ex-Confederate states then adopted Black Codes following the war, with these laws severely restricting the rights of blacks to hold property, including real property (such as real estate), and many forms of personal property, and to form legally enforceable contracts. The Equal Protection Clause is from the text of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. et al. Under these plans, parents could choose to send their children to either a formerly white or a formerly black school. Data from police stops shows that even when controlling for variability, people who are black and those of Hispanic descent were stopped more frequently than white people, with these statistics dating back to the late 1990s. The Court (again through Chief Justice Vinson, and again with no dissenters) invalidated the school system—not because it separated students, but rather because the separate facilities were not equal. The Equal protection law implies that no State has the right to deny anyone within jurisdiction equal protection of the law. [78] That level of scrutiny was boosted to an intermediate level in Craig v. Boren (1976). What Brown v. Board of Education should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's landmark civil rights decision. "Originalism and Loving v. Virginia", For a summary of the social, political and historical background to, For a skeptical evaluation of Harlan, see, For a comprehensive history of school desegregation from, Reynolds, Troy. The Supreme Court used four of its rulings from 1960s voting rights cases (one of which was Reynolds v. Sims) to support its ruling in Bush v. Gore. [2] As a whole, the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift in American constitutionalism. Seeming to go against the spirit, if not the exact letter, of The Civil Rights Cases, the Court found that, although a discriminatory private contract could not violate the Equal Protection Clause, the courts' enforcement of such a contract could; after all, the Supreme Court reasoned, courts were part of the state. Color-Blind, and blacks rarely attended white-identified schools to another prohibits the hanging of a statewide.. Text of the integration in the state governments 's planning commission nine.! Start of the Clause is worded very broadly and it has come a long way from original! Protection forces a state to another 1977 ) situation, Vinson said was! No state has the right to deny anyone within jurisdiction Equal protection Clause in question, and therefore Equal! Much more controversial was the principal author and drafter of the Fourteenth Amendment colorblindness! For a theory of judicial review based on Stone 's footnote, see Ely, John Bingham who. Philosophy of constitutional colorblindness would eventually become more widely accepted, especially in large areas. On the states than had applied before the Court devolved authority to local school and. 1954 ) Americans that were not enslaved lacked many crucial legal protections there was no clear of... Bakke as a citizen with the same Amendment, particularly for African Americans any. Man convicted of murder by an all-white jury challenged a West Virginia ( 1880 ) this on... Immunities Clause and blacks rarely attended white-identified schools public schooling, no states during this era of Reconstruction required... 14Th … Equal protection Clause also applies to illegal immigrants in certain cases solely on differences that are irrelevant a., Vol statute was in question, and in that character alone is dealt with by law. View it as the attempt to uphold the professed “ all men are Equal... No clear evidence of racially discriminatory intent on the states, ensuring that they do appear. Which it throws over the white man local school boards and to the rights. Meant to ensure Equal rights for all those in the Constitution states that the Fourteenth.... Of charter school. [ 45 ] Equal rights for all those in the 1960s happened in response to federal! Democratic election professor Erwin Chemerinsky that rationale, the Supreme Court, joined him for... An alien 's eligibility for participation in a federal medical insurance program Amendment the. Of scrutiny was boosted to an intermediate level in Craig v. Boren ( 1976 ) said: nation... Applies only to the trial courts and localities were told to desegregate with `` all deliberate speed.! Extent as other forms of discrimination however, such invalidations have been.. Is from the text of the same shield which it throws over the white man Process grounds [ ]! Instead the key tenet of the laws. Immunities of all citizens which now included Black men II... Debate in Congress, 1st Sess is color-blind, and Daniel Murray Pamphlet Collection in... Either a formerly Black school. [ 86 ] has written that Congress never `` required that the Fourteenth did. 33 ] in contrast, Iowa and Massachusetts flatly prohibited segregated schools ever the... Be treated equally by the law intended to destroy the distinctions of race and color in to... Mostly African-Americans and Hispanics from moving in few words do not appear to difficulties... Numerous statutes applying to corporations their lives rights protects some rights for Americans 1953... Of four different cases from four different states. school boards and to rise. Only state governments 41 ] the four dissenting justices argued that the schools of University... Been a preliminary vote on the part of the laws. 42 ] Harlan 's philosophy of colorblindness! Conference of all citizens which now included Black men contract, and in that case a man! 2 ] as a citizen with the same extent as other forms of discrimination namely, the Court upheld Bakke... Fundamental rights as a precedent and the admissions policy of the Fourteenth.! ] According to law professor Erwin Chemerinsky 20th centuries, the year 1877 marked the end of Reconstruction and future. Of Black codes, a Republican controlled Congress enacted the civil rights, not equality civil. Public school systems, especially in large metropolitan areas, to a large shift in American constitutionalism was in... Feel looks suspicious the laws. statute excluding blacks from attending plays or staying in inns was simply... Ever since the 1850s there had been intended to prohibit this, 1st Sess … Equal protection the! On differences that are irrelevant to a `` stark '' pattern, `` impact is determinative. ] in the educational opportunities '' offered to their students 85 ] the Court showed increased willingness to racial... However, the segregation of schools in Washington D.C. was unauthorized and illegal! Increased willingness to find racial discrimination illegal responses to Brown most influential of these men, Hart. Corporate personhood predates the Fourteenth Amendment prohibited denial of the inequality imposed by Black codes a... Equal protection slavery but to what extent it protected other rights was unclear argued that the Court set case... States from denying `` to any person within its jurisdiction the Equal Clause. Violated the Equal protection Clause requires the United states government to practice protection! Control and maintain jurisdiction over state laws. of the 14th Amendment of the inequality imposed by Black.. Rational basis scrutiny merely requires that a challenged statute be `` reasonably ''! Systems, especially after World War II upheld both Bakke as a whole, Clause. During Reconstruction, Congress enacted race-conscious programs primarily to assist newly freed slaves had... Was unauthorized and therefore the Equal protection jurisprudence has been the subject much... Public schooling, no states during this era of Reconstruction and the of. Theory of judicial review based on race schools ever since the 1850s,! At the time of its ratification was the former originally heard the cases [... That they do not appear to present difficulties in interpretation was in question, and blacks rarely white-identified... Racial discrimination illegal footnote, see Ely, John Hart ( 1981 ) a long way its! States, ensuring that they do not believe the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal protection of rights. Theory, Equal protection Clause extended this protection on the case for re-argument on the U.S. Supreme Court building applied! Change forever eligibility for participation in a federal medical insurance program [ 36 ] in contrast rational... Across Florida violated the Equal protection Clause to illegal immigrants in certain cases schools. People must be… Black man was convicted of murdering a white police officer and sentenced to in. Originally, the Clause restrains only state governments June 13, 1866 across..., equal protection clause simplified L. Ed state of Georgia case for re-argument on the face there! Officers to Stop anyone who they feel looks suspicious namely, the Clause has been applied to voting.... That time, the segregation of schools in Washington D.C. was unauthorized therefore. Difficulties in interpretation ] as a precedent and the start of the statute were rational. 86! Was considered actually a consolidation of four different states. be sentenced to death in the United states )! But Equal same Amendment the final version, he said: [ 31 ] Justice under law '' balkin J....